AloneReaders.com Logo

Fast Facts & Insights: Knowledge Cards

In a World Cup Match, chasing 335, Sunil Gavaskar scored an unbeaten 36 off 174 balls.

More About This Card

In the annals of cricket, especially during the World Cup, there are performances that become legendary, sometimes for feats of extraordinary skill and other times for their puzzling nature. One such innings that has perplexed fans and analysts alike was played by Sunil Gavaskar, one of India's greatest opening batsmen, during the 1975 World Cup. In a group stage match against England, India was set a formidable target of 335 runs to win. However, Gavaskar's approach to the chase left everyone baffled.

During this match, Gavaskar played an incredibly slow innings, scoring just 36 runs off 174 balls without being dismissed. His strike rate was a meager 20.68, and his innings included just a single boundary. What made this innings particularly bewildering was the context of the game. It was a One Day International with a high chase required, yet Gavaskar’s batting was reminiscent of a timeless Test match. The innings is often cited when discussing overly defensive and inexplicable performances in the history of limited-overs cricket.

Several theories have been put forward to explain Gavaskar's approach. Some have speculated that he was protesting against the quality of pitches or some team strategies that he disagreed with. Others believe it was merely an off day or a gross misjudgment of the match situation. Gavaskar himself has been somewhat cryptic about the reasons behind such an innings, sometimes mentioning that it was a bad day where he could not time the ball well.

Regardless of the reasoning, the impact of his innings was palpable. India ended up scoring only 132 runs for 3 wickets in 60 overs, leading to a resounding defeat by 202 runs. This match is often remembered for its stark contrast to the high-scoring exploits commonly seen in later years of One Day Internationals. Gavaskar's innings stood as a stark, almost rebellious statement against the evolving nature of limited-overs cricket, emphasizing how deeply the formats and strategies in cricket have changed over the decades.

Gavaskar's enigmatic innings remains a focal point of discussion whenever cricketing debates turn to bizarre or inexplicably conservative approaches to run-chasing. Despite this famous slow innings, Sunil Gavaskar's reputation as a stalwart of Indian cricket remains untarnished, attributed to his otherwise stellar contributions to the sport. Such an incident underscores the unpredictable and dramatic nature of cricket, where every game can tell a different story.